The New York Times Agency May 2010
EN_00913897_2199
(NYT32) GREENBURGH, N.Y. -- Jan. 10, 2003 -- NY-NUKE-SAFETY-CRITICS -- Emergency plans are inadequate to protect the public from a disastrous leak of radiation at the Indian Point nuclear plant near New York City and do not fully take into account the possibility of a terrorist attack, according to a report commissioned by Gov. George E. Pataki and released on Friday. A spokesman for Entergy, which owns the Indian Point complex, said that the company still believes the disaster plans could "protect public safety." Alex Matthiessen, center, of Riverkeeper, a group critical of the Indian Point nuclear plant, at a news conference Friday, Jan. 10, 2003, in Greenburgh, N.Y. (Richard L. Harbus/The New York Times)
CENA MINIMALNA - 100 USD
2003-01-10
EAST NEWS
The New York Times Agency
Richard L. Harbus/The New York Times/Redux
16414943
0,81MB
25cm x 17cm by 300dpi
10, 2003, A, ACCORDING, ACCOUNT, ALEX, AND, ARE, AT, ATTACK, BELIEVES, BY, CENTER, CITY, COMMISSIONED, COMPANY, COMPLEX, CONFERENCE, COULD, CRITICAL, DISASTER, DISASTROUS, DO, EMERGENCY, ENTERGY, FOR, FRIDAY, FROM, FULLY, GEORGE, GOV, GREENBURGH, GROUP, HARBUS, IN, INADEQUATE, INDIAN, INTO, JAN, LEAK, MATTHIESSEN, NEAR, NEW, NEWS, NOT, NUCLEAR, NYT32, OF, ON, OWNS, PATAKI, PLANS, PLANT, POINT, POSSIBILITY, PROTECT, PUBLIC, RADIATION, REDUX, RELEASED, REPORT, RICHARD, RIVERKEEPER, SAFETY, SAID, SPOKESMAN, STILL, TAKE, TERRORIST, THAT, THE, TIMES, TO, WHICH, YORK,